Monday, March 20, 2017

Holly Lawn



Site Name: Holly Lawn


Date of Construction: ca. 1901


Reason for Construction: Built to be one of the mansions to house Richmond’s “new money” families.


Site History: As the “new money” population began to grow, so did the number of larger mansions in the city of Richmond.  Wiley Anderson, a prominent architect known for some of the monument avenue mansions he designed, was commissioned by insurance agent Andrew Beirne Blair to design another extravagantly huge house to be put on the market.  The house was originally bought by Charles B. Cooke, but it changed owners relatively frequently until it was purchased by Leslie Stack and Frank Rizzo in 2004.  Some of the more notable owners were Dr. Ennion G. and Anna Williams who named the property Holly Lawn after the numerous Holly Trees surrounding the house and Graham Peroke who gave the use of the house to the Council of Gardens Club who added an auditorium wing.


Area History: Post Civil War Richmond was on the way to expansion and improvement, and the national movement towards creating an “ideal suburb” led to the development of what would become the Bellevue neighborhood.  Lewis Ginter and John Pope were instrumental in creating the neighborhood and were responsible for purchasing land around Brook road including “Hickory Hill” and turned the once farmland into a thriving suburban neighborhood.  Although Holly Lawn isn’t technically a part of Bellevue, it more than compares to the larger homes on Pope Avenue, the street within the enclave that features the largest house built in the neighborhood.  


Changes in Site: Until fairly recently, Holly Lawn has been well preserved and has kept most of its original structure, aside from the low auditorium that was added to northern exterior  of the building in 1973 by the Council of Garden’s Club. However, a storm that hit the Richmond area in June 2016 left the historic site damaged by a fallen 175 year old oak tree that destroyed the front portion of the home, including the main bedroom, the second floor widow’s walk, and the porch roof. The current owners of the house have launched a project to rebuild Holly Lawn and restore and retain its unique intricacies and historic character as they do so.


Changes in Surrounding Area: The suburban neighborhood known as Bellevue was annexed by Richmond in 1914, and by the 1920s, the Bellevue neighborhood blossomed as a middle class neighborhood, with the help of a growing middle class and the arrival of the automobile, which made it easier for middle class families to move back and forth from the cities and the suburbs. By the 1940s the majority of Bellevue’s historic homes had already been built, resulting in the wide range in architectural styles in Bellevue’s homes. The age and unique styles of the homes in this area played a factor in the devastating loss caused by the June 2016 storm that damaged this neighborhood, destroying homes, cars, trees, and power lines. Since the storm, the neighborhood has been making efforts to recover what was lost or damaged by the storm, and repair the historic buildings that suffered damage from wind and fallen trees.

Reflection: During this project, we learned about the one of the most difficult obstacles caretakers/owners of historic sites have to deal with in relation to the maintenance of historic sites - natural disasters. Unpredictable and inevitable, damage caused by natural disasters can throw a wrench into any maintenance/ reconstruction effort made for a historic site. The restoration of the site, while staying true to the original site is extremely difficult as well, and sometimes, it is impossible to retain everything the original site had. While the effort to restore Holly Lawn is difficult and ongoing, it forces one to appreciate the things Holly Lawn has that haven’t been destroyed by the storm, as well as the lengthy efforts the homeowners have gone through to keep this historic site alive.

Sources



Childlers, Doug. "After the storm: Homeowners launch a months-long rehab of Holly Lawn." Richmond
   Times Dispatch. Last modified August 13, 2016. Accessed March 17, 2017. http://www.richmond.com/
   realestate/features/great-homes/article_8d510fe2-60b9-11e6-8cae-a7c1f76d6114.html.


"History." Bellevue Civic Association. Accessed March 18, 2017. http://bellevueweb.org/history/.


Jr., Harry Kollatz. "A Very Fine House." Richmondmagazine.com. March 01, 2012. Accessed
February 16, 2017. http://richmondmagazine.com/home/latest/history-of-holly-lawn/.

Monfort, Ashley. "Storm destroys historic homes in Richmond's Bellevue neighborhood." NBC12 On Your
   Side. Last modified June 17, 2016. Accessed March 19, 2017. http://www.nbc12.com/story/32249996/
   storm-destroys-historic-homes-in-richmonds-bellevue-neighborhood.

Moomaw, Graham. "Historic Hermitage Road home damaged by storm in hard-hit North Side." Richmond
   Times Dispatch. Last modified June 7, 2016. Accessed March 16, 2017. http://www.richmond.com/

   news/local/city-of-richmond/article_876c67d2-b548-5053-9d00-391a5f43e98d.html.

U.S. Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service, “National

Register of Historic Places Inventory - Nomination Form,” Holly Lawn, 1982. Accessed February 15, 2017. http://dhr.virginia.gov/registers/Cities/Richmond/127-0055_Holly_Lawn_1982_Final_Nomination.pdf

The Church Hill Tunnel

Church Hill tunnel east entrance (c. 1900)

Church Hill Tunnel east entrance (2017)

Church Hill Tunnel west entrance (1872, during construction)


Church Hill Tunnel west entrance (2017)


Name of the Site: Church Hill Tunnel

Date of Construction: Feb 1, 1872- Dec 11, 1873

Reason for construction:
Fully constructed in 1873, the Church Hill Tunnel was part of the Reconstruction effort in Richmond. The Chesapeake Ohio Railway wanted to facilitate train traffic from the James River ports to the C&O Railroads on Seventeenth St.

Brief history of the site:
Richmond, as the former capital of the Confederacy, had been left in ruins following the rebels’ destruction of government buildings, homes, and bridges by fire to destroy anything that would be of use to the Union at the end of the Civil War. In addition, the city lacked an efficient railroad system which greatly inhibited Richmond’s growth during Reconstruction. On February 1, 1872, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway began construction of the Church Hill tunnel, which would begin near Shockoe Creek near Nineteenth street, run under Jefferson Park, cross under Broad Street, pass near St. John’s Church, and come out near Chimborazo Park- stretching across 10 blocks. The tunnel’s construction would enable a connection between the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad tracks in Shockoe Valley and the docks on the James River at Rocketts Landing. From the beginning of the tunnel’s construction, it proved to be an unsteady project. Multiple cave ins and small incidents resulted in the death of reportedly ten workers, as the land that made up the Church Hill area was largely shifty and unstable. The project was officially completed on December 11, 1873. The David Anderson train was the first to journey through the tunnel. The tunnel soon fell into disuse, as the shallow water of the James River did not allow for the movement of large, oceangoing vessels into Richmond. With the construction of a new viaduct in Richmond and laying of railroad tracks leading to the Tidewater ports, the tunnel was rarely used. In 1902, the last scheduled train traveled through the tunnel, and in 1915, the tunnel was deemed unsafe and the city closed it off until 1925.
In the early 1920s, rail traffic had increased significantly on the C&O, so the decision was made to restore the tunnel to service. On October 2, 1925, C&O locomotive no. 231 entered the tunnel to begin repairs. The train was nearing the western portal of the tunnel at Eighteenth Street when bricks began to fall from the tunnel ceiling. The falling bricks broke the electrical connections, and the tunnel became dark. Train workers at the eastern portal about a mile from locomotive 231 felt a sharp swoosh of air, and were able to escape to the outside. Soon after, 190 feet of the 4,000 foot tunnel collapsed. Some men were able to dive under the train car and crawl out of the tunnel, however many were not as lucky. Chaos ensued outside of the tunnel. A carpenter provided an eyewitness account of the minutes following the disaster: “Men passed me screaming and fighting. Some of them yelled that they had knives and would cut anybody that got in their way. The confusion lasted for a long time it seems. There were no lights. Men ran back and forth bewildered. Some of them ran toward the cave-in. Others butted their heads into the sidewalls, fell over the ties and rails and knocked each other down. We were without knowing what had happened or what was going to happen.” It is unknown how many men died in the collapse, however many Richmonders refer to the tunnel as a “tomb,” as the train and men trapped within it have never been retrieved. Rescue efforts on that day resulted in additional cave-ins, and despite Richmond’s racial segregation at the time, whites and blacks alike stood around the tunnel waiting for any kind of news from officers. Such an excavation today could result in an additional collapse, one that could take a significant portion of Church Hill down with it- a risk that Richmond is not ready or willing to take. Eventually, on October 11, workers reached a flatcar by slowly and laboriously digging through the ground. They were then able to reach the engine of the train, where they found Tom Mason, the head engineer, dead. No more bodies could be found. Further rescue efforts were deemed futile, and railroad officials decided that the tunnel, along with the train car and men within it, would be filled with sand and closed off forever. The Richmond Times Dispatch recorded the train’s obituary, in which it was stated that “The train might not be seen for another geological epoch when men of a new civilization discover a relic of the Twentieth Century in what once was the blue marl of Church Hill.”

Brief history of the surrounding area:
The story of Church Hill is one defined by the socioeconomics of settlement patterns. It begins in 1737 when Col. Byrd (or Major William Mayo, as there is some dispute) included the area in the original grid plan for Richmond. The Hill’s first years saw minimal ownership and usage, the only establishment being St John’s Church that was built in 1741. Isaac Coles was the first man to ever hold land in the area. It was eventually parceled and sold to one Richard Adams. Adams began the actual building of a neighborhood sometime around 1788. Shortly after Adams also sectioned off his own land with the hopes that settlers would move east. In the 1810s, the wealthier of Richmond began to erect homes in the Church Hill area. The most elite lived in the St John’s Church district, while a substantial population of tradesmen and craftsmen inhabited Northern Church Hill. Settlement increased slowly and surely through the Panic of 1819 and into the 1830s. The 1840s saw the next influx homebuilders as a result from economic flourishing. Railroads, iron industry, and increased mobility of the upper tier in Richmond created the push east. This ease of transport did not spread to most other citizens, however, and the area was still rather isolated from other parts of Richmond. By the 1840s and 50s, houses were being built closer and closer together due to the rise in population. These decades also saw the establishment of Lee Street Baptist Church, a pinnacle of Church Hill heritage and history. During the Civil War, little growth occurred in the area, and afterwards the first of two distinct socio economic shifts that have since defined Church Hill’s history came about. Although the bustling economy of Richmond, partly due to the tobacco industry, continued to thrive, as demonstrated by the building of the Church Hill tunnel in the 1870s to continue augmenting growth, the upper class began to move out of the area that once defined their prestige. In her book “Neighborhoods of Richmond,” Mary Wingfield Scott mourns the loss of the beautiful ante-bellum housing and the “decline of the neighborhood” “to near-slum condition.” The majority of whites moved out of the neighborhood between 1890 and 1930, partly because of expansion west, and partly because of legislative segregation not mentioned by Scott.
The above paragraph on the history of Church Hill was primarily written using Mary Wingfield Scott’s book and the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form for the Church Hill North district. Both sources neglect to explain why major shifts in population demographics occurred between 1890-1930. The truth of the matter does not lie wholly in westward expansion or simply the whims of the upper class, but instead purposeful segregation of the city. This trend began when African American men were given the right to vote in 1871. The government adjusted the districts of the city so as to concentration all African American voters in the Jackson Ward area and gerrymander their votes. The precedent was enhanced with the coming of the streetcars in 1888 that allowed wealthy citizens to flee to suburbs while poor blacks were left in the city center. Between 1911 and 1948, legislative residential segregation was used, legally or not, despite being repeatedly declared unconstitutional. Other policies such as blockbusting, steering, and redlining further separated whites and blacks. The 1940s and 50s saw a huge increase in the use of Federal public housing in Richmond. These were concentrated in the Church Hill area and examples remain, such as Mosby, Fairfield, and Creighton. This timeline aligns with the one presented above and shows that white flight was not an accident.
In the 1990s and into the 21st century, a new trend of gentrification has arisen. As the historic buildings of Church Hill became more fashionable to urban homeowners, they returned to Church Hill. This in part shows an upward trend for the small businesses of the area, but it also presents a worsening in the station of African Americans forced, especially through recent foreclosure crisis, into public housing while white people infiltrate the area. The Church Hill tunnel came at the cusp of this burgeoning problem in the 1870s, and partly fell into disuse because of the movement of businesses from the area along with white flight. In some ways it is represents an area in Limbo, constantly defined by demographic and socioeconomic gaps.

What about the site has changed?
Since the tunnel’s collapse in 1925, both portals have been addressed in different ways. The West Portal, also known as the North Portal, is situated on North Eighteenth Street. This entrance has been sealed with a slab of concrete engraved with the year 1926, which marks the year when the tunnel was officially closed. Situated feet from the tunnel’s entrance is the Shockoe Valley Pizza & Bar and T. W Wood & Sons apartments. People live feet from this entrance! People barbecue right in front of this entrance! This appalled us when we visited the site, how can people be so comfortable living next to the site of such a devastating event? The East Portal, located neared Chimborazo Park, has largely been unmaintained. There used to be a wire fence blocking the entrance from intruders, though it has since been disposed of. The railway bed, after the tracks had been removed, became a creek. Greenery largely blocks the tunnel from view, and graffiti covers the inside walls near the opening. It is obvious that this is an often-visited site, as everyday litter can be seen around the site and many disregarded tires float along the creek and serve as a makeshift bridge to cross from side to side.

What about the surrounding area has changed?
After the collapse in 1925, the St John’s Historic District fell into significant economic turmoil as the white elite population fled the area and residential segregation concentrated the black majority into its bounds. Crime rates, rape and assault incidents, and the percentage of population working in unskilled jobs all rose in the 1970s, while the average income fell below that of the city of Richmond. Despite the return of small businesses with renewal efforts in the 1990s and an increase in gentrification, the people with lowest economic status have been pushed into federal housing like Creighton Court.

Reflection:
History is created through documentation. What is written down in easy to find resources is what generations repeat later on, whether it is true or not. One aspect of this project that was very revealing of this fact was the prejudice and near censorship some documents presented about the residential segregation that was so prominent in Church Hill and the repercussions it has had on the community. This project served as a wakeup call to the ease with which vital information such as this is simply glossed over or even completely left out in government produced forms or the books they most prominently reference. Personally, we will continue to push for the true motives behind biased historical information.
From visiting both entrances of the tunnel, we were able to see two ways in which historical monuments can be addressed by the public. One, the west portal, demonstrated the ease at which a historical monument can be integrated into everyday life. People live and work around the west portal, they see it everyday. In this way many Richmonders are able to remain informed of the history that occurred there almost 100 years ago. At the same time, however, we feel that the placement of everything is a little strange. Someone’s bedroom is 10 feet from the tunnel, there are grills lined up right in front of the entrance. It feels wrong to hold a family barbecue feet from an area of such devastating history, to live moments from this “tomb.” However we understand that life must go on- there are houses to build and roads to pave! In contrast, the east tunnel has become largely overgrown. Situated near Chimborazo Park, it is quite the hike to reach the tunnel. We practically fell over the edge! Although it has been ill-maintained, it feels almost fitting for it to be this way, hidden among the trees in peace. Only those who are truly determined to know its history can reach it.

Authors: Mary Dryden Maio ad Kenan Potter

Bibliography

Evans, Jessica. "What is Church Hill, and how has it changed over time?" Made in Church Hill. http://arts.vcu.edu/madeinchurchhill/2015/01/09/what-is-church-hill-and-how-has-it-changed-over-time/.
Griggs, Walter S., Jr. The Collapse of Richmond's Church Hill Tunnel. Charleston, SC: The History Press, 2011. Digital file.
———. Hidden History of Richmond. Charleston, SC: The History Press, 2012. Digital file.
Holmberg, Mark. Mark Holmberg to CBS 6 newsgroup, "Is the Church Hill Tunnel still a menace?," October 2, 2015. Accessed March 19, 2017. http://wtvr.com/2015/10/02/is-church-hill-tunnel-still-a-menace/.
"National Register of Historic Places Registration Form." Unpublished manuscript, September 5, 1997. Accessed March 19, 2017. http://dhr.virginia.gov/registers/Cities/Richmond/127-0820_Church_Hill_North_HD_1997_Final_Nomination.pdf.
Richmond Times Dispatch (Richmond, VA). "Church Hill Tunnel." February 9, 2014. Accessed March 19, 2017. http://www.richmond.com/news/collection_8c73d098-91f7-11e3-ae80-001a4bcf6878.html#6.
Scott, Mary Wingfield. Old Richmond Neighborhoods. N.p.: William Byrd Press, 1950.

"Timeline of Housing Events." Virginia Memory. Accessed March 19, 2017. http://www.virginiamemory.com/online-exhibitions/exhibits/show/mapping-inequality/mapping-inequality-timeline.


Sunken Road: Fredericksburg, VA

Sunken Road 1862
Sunken Road 2017
Site Name:
   Sunken Road, Fredericksburg

Date of Construction:
    September 1862

Reason for Construction:
     Confederate soldiers needed a place to hide during battle, particularly the Battles of Fredericksburg and Antietam. They dug a trench in what is now Sunken Road, though it was also known as the Bloody Lane due to the nature of the battles that were fought there.
Site History:
    The site where the Battle of Antietam was fought is known as "the Cornfield" and it was located in Maryland and parts of Northern Virginia. Antietam was the bloodiest battle of the Civil War and over 23,000 soldiers were either killed or wounded in the Cornfield. The Sunken Road itself was designed to be a trench near the Confederate fort in Fredericksburg. During the Battle of Antietam it was a key turning point of the battle in favor of the South after they rose from the trench to take out the front ranks of the approaching Union Army. In the end, it was a technical victory for the South after General McClellan failed to follow after General Lee when he lead his troops out of Fredericksburg. In addition, on this site, there is a house known as the Innis house where a woman named Martha Stevens lived during the Civil War. She is known to have stayed in her house during the battle and provided aid to the soldiers who were wounded.
Area History:
     Fredericksburg itself was the site of the Battle of Fredericksburg and was a pretty important place during the Civil War. In addition to the war, however, the town has a very strong Irish presence and there are a lot of centers for Irish culture that can still be found in the downtown Fredericksburg area.
What about the site has changed?
    Obviously, the road is no longer used as a war trench, but rather as a historical site and a walking trail where people can come to walk along the road and read about its history. The road is now paved and has a stone wall along the side of it to recreate the wall that was built along the trench. In addition the graves of General Thomas Cobb and Martha Stevens can also be found along the trail.
What about the area has changed?
      Fredericksburg is still very much an old-fashioned-looking town, but it is obviously more modernized and has plenty of restaurants, thrift stores, and art galleries to visit in the downtown area. All the buildings, however are still Civil War Era houses and buildings. The downtown Fredericksburg area also has a lot of train stations because it's a very common method of transportation to get to Washington D.C from the town.
Reflection:
     I chose this site because I was born in Fredericksburg and know a lot about the history of this site. I've always found it really interesting so I wanted to look into it a bit more and provide people with some more information about a very important Civil War site that they may not have known. I really enjoyed being able to go back to a historical site that has some significance to me and research it more. I also learned a lot about the site that I didn't know even though I had done research about it before.
Author:
     Lilian Price
Sources:
     Bowman, Tom. "Antietam: A Savage Day in American History." NPR. September 17, 2012. Accessed March 20, 2017. http://www.npr.org/2012/09/17/161248814/antietam-a-savage-day-in-american-history.

The Byrd Theater

The Byrd Theater (c. 1929)

The Byrd Theater (2017)




Site Name: The Byrd Theater

Date of Construction: 1928

Reason for Construction: Built to be one of the Nation’s Grand Movie Palaces

Site History: The Byrd theater was named after William Byrd who was one of the founders of Richmond. Build by Walter Coulter and Charles Somma in 1928 to be one of the nations grand movie palaces it was designed like French Empires. This design was created by Fred Bishop however, the decor was by Brunet studios in New York. When the theater was first built it had two sound systems a Vitaphone and an organ for the silent movies. The original 35mm Simplex standard was replaced with Simplex 35mm projectors in 1953 which are still used today. The sound system was replaced with a Dolby Digital system in 2006 after Ray Dolby visited the theater in 2004. The Byrd has been playing movies for over 80 years with few changes to appearance and functions. The Byrd Theatre Foundation made and agreement with the Samuel Warren family in 2007 in order to “purchase, restore and preserve the theater as a vital community resource.”

Surrounding Area History: The Byrd Theater is near the end of what Richmonders call “Carytown.” Carytown was opened in 1938 as Richmond's first shopping strip. After residents saw how well Carytown was going another shopping center (Willow Lawn) was opened in 1956. This caused a bad effect on Carytown because Willow Lawn had more shops and better parking. The businesses of Carytown closed and the street became filled with petty crime. This lasted till the 1970s when off-duty police officers were sent and businesses petitioned to build parking decks. Then in 1974, Carytown was voted to be rebuilt. In 1983 they started the “annual sidewalk sale” where shop owner would bring their goods outside so pedestrians would see and buy them this is now seen as the annual Carytown Watermelon Festival.

How has the site changed? When the Byrd was first opened matinee cost twenty-five cents while evening movies cost fifty cents today movies are four dollars. The next major differences are the sound system and image system. When the theater was first built it had two sound systems a Vitaphone and an organ for the silent movies. The original 35mm Simplex standard was replaced with Simplex 35mm projectors in 1953 which are still used today. The sound system was replaced with a Dolby Digital system in 2006 after Ray Dolby visited the theater in 2004. Another change that I noticed is the location of the name of the theater. When the museum was first built it was vertically in the middle now it is horizontal on the right side.

How as the area changed? The major difference from the original Carytown and the Carytown to day are the stores. Not only do they have retail today nut there are restaurants, galleries, and even spas. However, another change was that above the stores there used to be apartments nut when the “mile of style” was reopened it turned strictly to retail. When compared to the area after the original quick downfall it is nothing like it. The streets of Carytown are always busy and never quiet and is in a very nice area. Carytown is where many families go out to eat and shop and a tourist destination for many.

Reflection: Overall, I feel like I learned more about the area around the theater than the theater itself.  I figured that the theater was built for its purpose and the changes to it were changes you would expect to see with the advancement of technology. I never knew how Carytown developed and the history of it. It was very interesting to me how it shut down because of Willow Lawn and turned into a quiet area. That is a huge contrast to the highly crowded area it is today.

Sources:

Byrd Theatre. "Byrd Theatre History." Byrd Theatre. Last modified 2017. Accessed
    February 15, 2017. http://byrdtheatre.com/history/.

"Byrd Theatre." National Park Service. Accessed February 15, 2017.
    https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/richmond/Byrd-Theater.html.

Beard, Brian. "How Carytown Escaped from Depression." River City Food Tours
    (blog). Entry posted 2017. Accessed March 18, 2017.
    http://www.rivercityfoodtours.com/how-carytown-escaped-from-depression/.

Author: Taylor Hill




The Hanover Courthouse


The Hanover Courthouse (c. 1767)


The Hanover Courthouse (2017)


Site Name: Hanover Courthouse

Date of Construction: 1735

Reason for Construction: Built to serve as both the County Seat and courthouse for the recently created Hanover County.

Site History: The Hanover Courthouse was constructed in 1735, by William Meriwether, just 15 years after the formation of Hanover County which occurred on November 16, 1720. It is a single-story, brick building, in a T-shape, where the courtroom lies in the rear of the T-shape. The historic courthouse would later be surrounded by a tavern, a country jail, and the clerk’s office. Its primary responsibilities were the political and judicial actions of the county, as it served as the center establishment and county seat in Hanover. The most famous case held in the Hanover Courthouse was called the “Parson’s Cause” which was successfully argued and won by Patrick Henry in 1763. Also, on the eve of the Revolutionary War, citizens of Hanover County gathered inside the courthouse to adopt what would be known as the “Hanover Resolutions”. These resolutions described their feelings and stances on issues with the Parliament of Great Britain. Hanover County’s Courthouse is one of the nation’s oldest and most famous courthouses.

Area History: Hanover County was founded on November 16, 1720, following the split of New Kent County. The county was named after King George I of Great Britain, as he was of the House of Hanover. Hanover County was also the birthplace of Patrick Henry, a famous American statesman, as well as Henry Clay, the author of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and future Secretary of State. The historic Hanover Courthouse lies just North of United States Route 301, and the buildings nearby are what make up the Hanover County Courthouse Historic District.

What about the site has changed?
Several new complexes, including two new court buildings and a library, have been built around the original courthouse.

What about the surrounding area has changed?
Many new highways, including I-95 and I-64 have been built in the surrounding area. While it is significantly less rural than the area had been, Hanover County is still a fairly rural county in Virginia.

Reflection: We learned that the Hanover Courthouse has been the site of a few famous court cases. In addition to this, we were able to learn more about the area that surrounds the courthouse and the new buildings and extensions that have been built at the site. Still in active use, it still remains one of the oldest courthouses in the nation, and its legacy lives on as the oldest courthouse still used for that purpose in the United States.

Authors: Adam Blankenship and Samuel Thornton


Tredegar Iron Works

(Tredegar Iron Works, 1865)

(Tredegar Iron Works, 2017)




Site Name: Tredegar Iron Works  
Date of Opening: 1837
Reason for Construction: A very successful iron foundry, the Tredegar Ironworks manufactured numerous products and was “Richmond’s foremost business concern for more than a century (NPS).”
Site History:
Tredegar Iron Works was established in Richmond in 1837. The Iron Works was significant in the community and economy, manufacturing a myriad of products, including cannons, locomotives, and sugar mills. Major contracts of the Iron Works were those to build bridges and railroads. The Iron Works had an important role in Virginian military history. During the Civil War, it was a hub of manufacturing warships, submarines, and more. Ammunition was also manufactured in the Iron Works during the Spanish American War, World War I, and World War II.


The Tredegar Iron Works remained financially successful despite the economic hardship of reconstruction and the 1840s iron industry depression. With industrialization, the financial success slowed with the rising preference of steel to iron. In 1952, a fire wrecked many buildings within the Iron Works. Production ended with this fire. Three buildings have since been restored. Sixteen of the original buildings within the Iron Works no longer exist today.


Today, the Tredegar Ironworks is a national historical site and a nonprofit museum. It explains the Civil War to visitors from African American, Northern, and Southern perspectives.
Area History: Located along the James River and near locations with large deposits of iron ore, Richmond became a major iron industry during the 1830s/40s, during which railroads became increasingly common. Just a couple of decades after the Tredegar Iron Works’ 1837 establishment, founder Joseph R. Anderson successfully turned the foundry from a failing business venture to a foundry that rivaled the best in the nation. Since 1854, the nature of the Iron Works’ business changed but remained profitable. During the Civil War, the foundry manufactured ships, cannons, and ammunition. The Iron Works continued to be in use for nearly another century, ending production after a large fire in 1952.
What about the site has changed?
While it was difficult to recreate the exact angle of 1865 picture, it is clear that there fewer buildings within the Iron Works in 2017. This is because of the 1952 fire that destroyed much of the site. Restoration occurred in the 1970s.
What about the surrounding area has changed?
The Tredegar Iron Works is located near the intersection of 5th St. and Tredegar St., directly across Brown’s Island. When the Iron Works was still active, the immediate surrounding area was sparse. The many buildings of the Iron Works took up a large amount of space on the James.


Today, more trees, a paved road, and a more developed bridge to Brown’s Island surround the Iron Works, which is located next to the Civil War Museum. The space around the Iron Works is often used as a recreational area, as the site of the Folk Festival, and has important historical significance.
Reflection:
While I am often near the Tredegar Iron Works when in Richmond, I underestimated its importance in local history. However, I have never visited the inside of the building or the Civil War Museum. Looking through the exhibits would teach me more about local history. The emphasis on the three different perspectives of the Civil War (African American, Union, Confederate) seems very interesting as well.

Author: Yashodhara Varma


Sources:
"A Guide to the Tredegar Iron Works Records." In Library of Virginia. Richmond,
VA: Library of Virginia, n.d. Accessed February 10, 2017.


Bumgardner, Sarah, and S. Nelson. Tredegar Iron Works: A Synecdoche for
Industrialized Antebellum Richmond. November 9, 1995. Accessed February 10,
2017. http://srnels.people.wm.edu/antrichf95/bumgard.html.


"Tredegar Iron Works." National Parks Service. Accessed February 10, 2017.
https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/richmond/WhiteHouse_of_theConfederacy.html.